Legal Opinion
Sec. Tr. & Sav. Bank of San Diego v. N.Y. Indem. Co.
California Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1934No. L. A. No. 14415PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Defendant appeals from a money judgment entered in favor of plaintiff.
The cause went to trial on an agreed statement of facts which may be summarized as follows: At all times material to this action Gordon L. Eby and "Lewis H. Homer were attorneys-in-fact for the Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, which for brevity we will refer to as the Indemnity Company, and each was authorized to execute, acknowledge and deliver in the name of the company, indemnity and fidelity bonds and undertakings, including those similar to the one here involved. Homer had offices with and was employed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- World Exchange Bank v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Burr v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Security Trust & Savings Bank v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Trade Bank of New York v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Trade Bk. N.Y. v. U.S. Fid.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughn v. Atlantic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- Earl v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934