Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Bromley Quarry & Asphalt, Inc.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 9, 2016No. 109864Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 109,864 WILLIS L. ARMSTRONG and STEPHANIE J. PROHASKA, Appellants, v. BROMLEY QUARRY & ASPHALT, INC., et al., Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Generally, a trespasser is one who enters the premises of another without any right, lawful authority, or express or implied invitation or license. Trespass requires an intention to enter upon the particular piece of land in question, irrespective of whether the actor knows or should know that he or she is not entitled to enter. 2. Conversion is the unauthorized assumption or exercise of the right of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jones v. HansenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  2. Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. Gerchberg Ex Rel. Gerchberg v. LoneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  4. Davidson v. DenningSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  5. Bomhoff v. Nelnet Loan Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API