Legal Opinion

Lawless v. Schoenaker

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 11, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

This action was brought to recover upon an alleged agreement by which the defendant was to pay the plaintiff one-half of the commissions which the former received for acting as executor of an estate in consideration of plaintiff’s aiding the defendant in the performance of his duties. There was a sharp conflict in the proof. The plaintiff asserted that such an agreement was made. The defendant denied it. The jury found for the defendant.

The chief question for consideration upon this appeal relates to the exclusion of evidence sought to be introduced by the plaintiff. The plaintiff called as a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. People v. . BuchananNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Doheny v. . LacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. Wallace v. . WallaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Baumann v. . SteingesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yaron v. YaronNew York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Comprehensive Habilitation Services, Inc. v. Commerce Funding Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of DixNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  4. Humphrey v. NordenNew York City Family Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API