Legal Opinion

De Cecco v. Weber

United States District Court

Decided December 30, 1947PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mabtino, D. C. J.

The complainant has instituted dispossess proceedings based upon an affidavit of jurisdiction in this court which affidavit sets forth two separate grounds for the removal of the defendants.

The first ground is based upon the right to possession grounded on the theory that defendants are tenants at will. The affidavit states that "On September 1, 1939, I made a lease with the defendants for the continued occupancy of said premises, which lease was for a period of 'five years and expired on September 1, 1944. After expiration of said lease the defendants continued in possession…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Maier v. ChampionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
  2. George Jonas Glass Co. v. RossSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Manahan v. City of EnglewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackson v. R. G. Whipple, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Weber v. De CeccoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API