Legal Opinion

Taylor v. United States Department of Justice Executive Office for United States Attorneys

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 31, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2020-0927Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JOSHUA MARK TAYLOR, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 20-927 (JMC) v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Joshua Mark Taylor brought this action against the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office for United States Attorneys (EOUSA) for failing to provide records in response to his request for information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552. 1 The Parties have both moved for summary judgment. ECF 12; ECF 19. At…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. National Archives & Records Administration v. FavishSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States Department of Justice v. Tax AnalystsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  5. Harold Weisberg v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API