Legal Opinion

State v. Grimes

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 14, 1901No. Nos. 12,575 — (9)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of Minneapolis, Kerr, J., of the offense of keeping a gambling house, and sentenced to imprisonment for ninety days in the city workhouse. _ From the judgment entered and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

In the municipal court defendant was convicted, and sentenced to ninety days’ imprisonment in the city workhouse, of the offense described in the second paragraph of section 2 of an ordinance of the city of Minneapolis approved February 27, 1894, which paragraph reads as follows:

“No person shall keep any house or place, or suffer or allow any house or place to him or her belonging, or by him or her occupied, or of which he or she has the control, to be kept for the purpose of gambling or gaming or fraudulent practices, or to be kept or resorted to for the purpose of betting, or wagering any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. City of Mankato v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  3. State v. RobitshekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HobenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  2. City of St. Paul v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. State Ex Rel. Connolly v. ParksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. State v. MarciniakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API