Legal Opinion

Cooney v. Pearl

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 2000No. 4D98-2799PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDell, J.

This appeal arises out of four conflicting orders on appellee’s, Robert Pearl, motion for new trial. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

On June 11, 1993, appellee sustained personal injuries in an automobile accident. On October 10, 1995, he filed suit against appellants, Mr. Cooney and Mr. Ferber, for loss of future earning capacity and for permanent injuries. He also joined appellant, St. Paul Insurance Company (StPaul), in the action for underin-sured motorist (UM) benefits.

Prior to trial, appellants made a motion in limine to exclude the testimony of Dr. Jacobs, an orthopedic…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. DePadro v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. MazzoranaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. DiMeglio v. Briggs-MugrauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Orlando/Orange County Expressway Authority v. LathamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. McLeodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API