Legal Opinion

Haider v. Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2000No. 99-349PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

¶1 Frances Mahon Deaconess Hospital (FMDH) appeals from the order of the Seventeenth Judicial District Court, Valley County, awarding Alyce Haider (Haider) mandatory attorney’s fees pursuant to § 39-2-915, MCA (1997). We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue raised by FMDH on appeal is whether § 39-2-915, MCA (1997), violates the Montana Constitution by denying parties equal access to the courts.

Factual and Procedural Background

¶3 This appeal has its genesis in a wrongful discharge action by Haider against FMDH, her former employer. During negotiations, an offer to arbitrate was made by Haider. Upon…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Billings Deaconess Hospital, Inc. v. AngelMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re the Adoption of C.J.H.Montana Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MainwaringMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Russell v. Masonic Home of Montana, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Boettcher v. Montana Guaranty FundMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gregory v. SpannagelMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Haider v. Frances Mahon Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API