Legal Opinion

Rympalski v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding challenging a determination finding him guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rule that prohibits selling a controlled substance. According to the misbehavior report, a confidential informant admitted to purchasing heroin from petitioner and also identified petitioner from a photo array. Contrary to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alba v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Vasquez v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Garcia v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Smith v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pisano v. FischerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Santana v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API