Legal Opinion

Couch v. Earnest

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 14, 1933No. 9129PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Chief Justice.

The plaintiffs in error are the county judge and commissioners, and the county clerk of Hidalgo county; the defendant in error being the assessor of taxes of the same county, who sought and obtained a writ of mandamus compelling the commissioners’ court to fix a tax rate and levy a tax on all property in old road district No. 1, to create a sinking fund and interest on $168,000 of bonds, being the residue of an original issue of $250,000 of bonds of said road district, which consists of the whole county, with the exception of that part of said county included in the Donna…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Earnest v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API