Legal Opinion

McLain v. Routzong

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 20, 1992No. 1911347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOUSTON, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Roger McLain and his wife Judy McLain, appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict for the defendant Aimee Cassondra Routzong. We affirm.

The McLains and Routzong were involved in an automobile accident in which Roger McLain was injured. The McLains sued Routzong, alleging negligence and wantonness; they also sued Southern Guaranty Insurance Company (“Southern Guaranty”), the McLains’ uninsured/under-insured motorist insurance carrier.1 Within five days after the McLains sued, Southern Guaranty elected not to participate in the trial of the case and agreed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Nationwide Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Burlington Northern R. Co. v. WhittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Cooper v. Bishop Freeman Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Alabama Power Co. v. BonnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Peden v. FullerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API