Legal Opinion
United States v. Eugene Crucean
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 28, 2001No. 00-2471PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge.
Appellate review of sentencing decisions has expanded vastly since the advent of the Sentencing Guidelines in 1987, as virtually everyone even slightly touched by the system knows. The scope of that review varies, however, depending upon what is presented: sometimes there is no jurisdiction at all to entertain the issue on appeal, sometimes review is for abuse of discretion, sometimes it is for clear error, and sometimes it is de novo. We have concluded that the challenges Eugene Cru-cean is trying to raise in the present case fall within the first category, for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Scott FranzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Carolyn Kay PoffCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Dolores Dejesus SolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert Daniel Ward and Rodney EllisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. M.L. Moore, Alex Ramos, James P. Young, and Edward L. Jackson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Mario GraciaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Lawrence CravensCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Pedro J. BosqueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Leonard AronCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.