Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. City of Pineville

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 2003No. 03-77PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

1 .THIBODEAUX, Judge.

Defendant, the City of Pineville, appeals the judgment of the trial court which granted plaintiffs’, Diane Reynolds and Carolyn Dianne Netherlin, motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, and denied the City’s motion for summary judgment on sex and age discrimination claims, deeming defendant’s cause of action moot. The trial court found that the City’s Chief of Police, Stanley Rogers, lacked the authority to unilaterally implement a longevity plan and reduce the base pay of particular staff members. Though the longevity pay increase was approved by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brittain v. Family Care Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Harvey v. FrancisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. INVESTMENT MGMT. SVCS., INC. v. Village of FolsomLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Superior Shipyard & Fabrication v. M & T Oceanographic Research, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API