Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hickson v. State ex rel. Woodridge Building Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 22, 1969No. 2094Published

1DissentCross, Chief Judge

I must of necessity respectfully dissent.

Appellants-respondents, Harry C. Hick-son, Chief Building Inspector of the City of Fort Lauderdale, the City of Fort Lau-derdale, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Edmund R. Burry, Fred E. Welker, Harrison L. Friese, James L. Leavitt and Allen B. Forbes, as and constituting the City Commission of the City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, appeal from a final judgment granting a peremptory writ of mandamus directing the issuance of a building permit to the appellee-relator, Woodridge Building Corporation, a New York corporation.

In 1964 the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Attorney-General v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Board of Public Instruction of Duval County v. SackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  3. City of Miami v. State ex rel. HoustonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Department of Public Safety Driver's License Division v. MitchellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API