VI Oil Company v. ANCHOR PETROLEUM COMPANY
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WORTHEN, Justice.
Defendant filed a petition for an intermediate appeal from the ruling of the trial court denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
The appellant, on the 6th day of - September, 1954, entered into a contract with respondent. The contract provided in part:
“ * * * Quantity: The quantity shall be all of the Buyers requirements up to a maximum quantity of 40,000 gallons per month and a minimum quantity of 20,000 per month, quantities subject to change by mutual agreement.”
The contract was forwarded unsigned to the plaintiff for its signing. The letter of transmittal stated:…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Maas v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 529Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Shunga Plaza, Inc. v. American Employers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Isaias Rodriguez Rodriguez v. Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
- Maas v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 529Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- Shunga Plaza, Inc. v. American Employers' InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.