Legal Opinion
City of Memphis v. Civil Service Commission
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided April 4, 2007No. W2006-01880-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · FarmerDavid R. Farmer, J.
in which ALAN E. HIGHERS, J., and HOLLY M. KIRBY, J., joined.
This administrative appeal arises out of the termination of Officers Mauricio Hearns’s (Officer Hearns), Henry Gray, Jr.’s (Officer Gray), Dorian Branch’s (Officer Branch), and Derick Jones’s (Officer Jones) (collectively “the officers”) employment with the City of Memphis Police Department (the Department) following their purchases of stolen Samsung televisions and digital video disc (DVD) players for their personal use. The Department terminated the officers’ employment after finding a violation of DR-104 Personal Conduct.…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Jackson Mobilphone Co. v. Tennessee Public Service Comm.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- Martin v. SizemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- City of Memphis v. Civil Service CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 2007
- McEwen v. Tennessee Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Tidwell v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by40 opinions
- MacOn v. Shelby County Government Civil Service Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2009
- Paul Pittman v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Mickel G. Hoback v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2015
- Penny v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2008
- City of Memphis v. Beverly PryeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.