Legal Opinion
Titus v. Wallick
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Boysun v. BoysunMontana Supreme Court · 1962
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FarleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
- Antonucci v. GravinaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Rogo v. Mahwah Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Westcott v. KonstantynowiczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.