Legal Opinion

Titus v. Wallick

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided September 27, 1933PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The decree under review will be affirmed, for the reasons given in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Bigelow.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boysun v. BoysunMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FarleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1940
  3. Antonucci v. GravinaNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. Rogo v. Mahwah Realty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. Westcott v. KonstantynowiczNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API