Legal Opinion

State v. Schleicher

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 10, 1969No. 53212PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENLEY, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment sentencing defendant to concurrent sentences of seven and five years, respectively, upon his conviction by a jury of second degree burglary and stealing. Sections 560.070, 560.110 and 560.156. 1 We reverse, because the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the conviction, and remand, because it appears from the record that the state may be able to produce additional evidence which would be sufficient.

By an information substituted for an indictment, Albert W. Schleicher (defendant), Thomas Maddox and Andrew Novak, Jr., were charged,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  4. State v. RichardsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. State v. CameronMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. State v. ClineSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  4. State v. MosherSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  5. State v. GonzalesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API