Sahli v. Woodbine Board of Education
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Rivera-Soto
To the extent the majority holds that “N.J.S.A. 18A:16-6 does not mandate that [a board of education] indemnify its attorney for the defense of a civil action against him in his capacity as Board solicitor[,]” and that this Board attorney is not entitled to insurance coverage for his actions as Board solicitor, ante at 324, 938 A.2d at 925, I concur with the majority’s reasoning and result.
*328However, to the extent the majority also holds that “because the Board’s attorney in this case was also sued in his capacity as secretary pro tern to the Board, he is entitled to indemnification for his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sahli v. Woodbine Bd. of Educ.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2006