Legal Opinion
Moore v. Scottsdale Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 7, 1994No. S94Q1193PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carley, Justice.
Appellant-plaintiff purchased a property insurance policy from appellee-defendant. The purchase was financed by Siuprem, Inc., an insurance premium finance company. See OCGA § 33-22-2 (2). Siuprem retained a power of attorney to cancel the policy in the event of default. Subsequently, appellant did default and Siuprem issued a ten-day notice of intent to cancel, OCGA § 33-22-13 (b), followed by a notice of cancellation. OCGA § 33-22-13 (c). At the time each notice was issued, appellant’s name and policy number, but not his address, were included on Siuprem’s computer-generated…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. GuessSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- Hill v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Georgia Mutual Insurance v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Clark v. Superior InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grubbs v. Credit General InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Admiral Insurance Company v. Cresent Hills Apartments, Bauer Agency, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Brooks Brown Insurance Agency, Inc. v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Admiral Insurance v. Cresent Hills ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Admiral Insurance v. Cresent Hills ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.