In re Ira Haupt & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Decision and Order on Referee’s Third Report on Applications for Allowances
This is the referee’s third report on application for allowances. Kamerman and Kamerman, accountants to the debt- or in possession, seeks $11,835 as a final allowance. The referee recommended no allowance. Krause, Hirsch & Gross, and Delson & Gordon, as attorneys for the debtor in possession, the bankrupt, and as special counsel to the trustee in bankruptcy, seek a final allowance of $61,162 and disbursements of $2,059.03. The referee recommended reimbursement of disbursements and, also,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Eureka Upholstering Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Henry Jacobowitz v. Double Seven CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Connelly v. Hancock, Dorr, Ryan & ShoveCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- In re Medina Quarry Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- In Re Ira Haupt & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Harris v. Supreme Plastics, Inc. (In Re Supreme Plastics, Inc.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980