Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Pearson

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 23, 1948No. A-11035PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is an original action instituted by the petitioner, Joe Pearson, Jr., to secure his release from confinement in the State Penitentiary.

It is contended by petitioner that if defendant is guilty of any crime, he is not guilty of rape in the first degree which is the crime for which he was tried and sentenced, and further alleges that the testimony of the prosecutrix was preposterous, unreasonable, and that there was no corroboration of her testimony.

Attached to the petition is an affidavit of Joe Pearson, Jr., pretending to set out the “actual” facts pertaining to the prosecution. In this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Clyde MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Ex Parte StinnettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  3. In Re FlowersCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  4. In Re Leo MaynardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. Ex Parte PeakerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ex Parte ThompsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1951
  2. Application of MassieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  3. In Re the Habeas Corpus of GregoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955
  4. Maghe v. PageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API