Legal Opinion
United States v. Trung Dang
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided October 22, 2018No. 17-2285PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Judge.
Trung Dang appeals his revocation sentence of 60 months' imprisonment, arguing that the district court 1 procedurally erred by (1) failing to consider the Chapter 7 policy statement range of 8 to 14 months' imprisonment; (2) relying exclusively on unproven, disputed allegations at sentencing; and (3) giving too much weight to the seriousness of the conduct forming the basis of his violation. He also argues that his sentence is substantively unreasonable because the court considered improper sentencing factors and imposed a sentence longer than necessary to satisfy the goals…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. FeemsterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Ruelas-MendezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Cowan GodfreyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Otis Mays, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Lamarvin T. DardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Anthony WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Craig WattersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. David ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.