Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Roake

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 3, 2002No. 2-01-0491PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Malley

The State charged defendant, Daniel G. Roake, with two counts of unlawful delivery of a controlled substance (720 ILCS 570/401(d) (West 2000)). Defendant filed a motion to suppress the contents of certain tape recordings. The trial court denied the motion in part and granted it in part. As to the part it granted, the court determined that the oral application procedure that the police used in seeking approval for the use of an eavesdropping device failed to satisfy any of the procedures mandated by article 108A of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1963 (725 ILCS 5/108A — 1 et seq. (West…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Devine v. $30,700.00 United States CurrencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. People v. EllisIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  3. People v. NievesIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. JurisecIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. EllisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  3. Board of Education, Proviso Township High School District No. 209 v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Labor v. Sackville Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  5. People v. CejaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API