Legal Opinion
Lang v. Lang
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 28, 1965No. 10225Published
1Opinion of the Court
17 Utah 2d 10 (1965)
403 P.2d 655
PHYLLIS LANG, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT,
v.
J. ROBERT LANG, DEFENDANT, SAMUEL J. CARTER, INTERVENOR AND RESPONDENT.
No. 10225.
Supreme Court of Utah.
June 28, 1965.
D.M. Amoss, Salt Lake City, for appellant.
Franklin Riter, Fred L. Finlinson, Salt Lake City, for respondent.
CROCKETT, Justice:
This appeal raises the question whether a Utah resident who has been appointed by a California court as executor of the estate of a California decedent, and who holds money from such estate in Utah, is subject to garnishment from a Utah court.
The plaintiff, Phyllis Lang, had…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Prospect Lodge No. 106, Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Wilcox v. District Court of Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Barusch v. BrainardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- Lang v. LangUtah Supreme Court · 1965
- Consolidated National Bank of Tucson v. Reiniger Mining & Smelting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931