Legal Opinion

Benedict v. Jones.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 23, 1901PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Plaintiff's Appeal. ActioN by Mary Benedict and others against H. C. J ones and wife and S. G. Atkin, heard by Judge Frederick Moore and a jury, át September Term, 1901, of the Superior Court of Buncombe County. Erom a judgment for the defendants, the plaintiffs appealed. *

1Opinion of the Court

PLAINTIFF'S APPEAL. This action was brought to recover possession of a lot of land in the possession of the defendants. On the 4th day of August, 1891, the defendant H. C. Jones, being the owner of six undivided one-sevenths interest in the same, and Hattie, his wife, another defendant, being the owner of the other one-seventh interest, all subject, however, to the right of dower of the other defendant, S. G. Atkin, who was the widow of T. W. Atkin, a former owner of the property, executed to J. C. Dickerson a deed of trust (the defendant S. G. Atkin joining in the deed) upon the property to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butner v. . BlevinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. McCaskill v. . McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. . LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Belk Ex Rel. Belk v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Jones v. . ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. Belk Ex Rel. Belk v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Belk Ex Rel. Belk v. BelkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API