Bateman v. Adams County Department of Child Services

OPINION

RILEY, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

AppellanlARespondent, Amanda Bate-man (Mother), appeals the trial court’s determination that her son, C.B., is a Child in Need of Services (CHINS).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Mother raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:(1) Whether the trial court, in error, permitted hearsay evidence within the dispositional report; and(2) Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s adjudication of C.B. as a CHINS.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On July 6, 2006, the Adams County Department of Child Services (ACDCS) removed C.B., born February 6, 2004,…