Legal Opinion · Dissent

Henderson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 4, 1992No. A92A1552Published

1DissentAndrews, Judge

I respectfully dissent since I do not agree with the majority that the instant prosecution violates Henderson’s constitutional protection *646against double jeopardy. The Forsyth County ordinance regarding disorderly conduct provides, in part, that it is unlawful for any person to engage in conduct which is likely to provoke or incite an immediate breach of the peace. OCGA § 16-5-23 (a), which outlines the offense of simple battery, provides that one “commits the offense of simple battery when he either (1) Intentionally makes physical contact of an insulting or provoking nature with the person…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API