Legal Opinion

Barkley Bros. v. Shockey

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided November 4, 1955No. 1689Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Suit was brought by Avon Shockey, a licensed real estate broker, claiming a commission for the sale of a house. The case was submitted to the trial court on a stipulation and deposition and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff for $1,250. This appeal followed, assigning as error the finding that plaintiff was the procuring cause of the sale.

Defendant corporation, a builder of homes, had completed the house in question and was offering it for sale. This was evidenced by a sign on the premises containing its name, address, and telephone number. In August 1954, Lawrence J.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rieffer v. HollingsworthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. Webster v. PerperDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Lady v. Realty Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Sechrist v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
  5. Zellan v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API