Legal Opinion

Block v. Rice

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 20, 1909No. 2Published

At Law. On motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, District Judge.

On or about the 10th day of August, 1907, Joseph Rice, as trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Samuel Fine, sold at public sale certain goods of the Fine bankrupt estate for the sum of $1,000. The purchaser paid by check, at that time, only $250, leaving a balance of $750 due. The purchaser of the property was a friend oí Rice and unable to raise all the purchase price on the day of sale, and Rice had drawn his individual check, which was there exhibited or given to the auctioneer, and it, together with the $250 paid by the purchaser, was turned over to Rice or his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. KingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  2. In re MulliganDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
  3. In re MarshDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1902
  4. In re Royea's EstateDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API