Legal Opinion

Brooke v. Ham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1921No. 16516Published

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Oswald, J., entered March 26, 1921, denying the relief prayed for, in an action to enjoin the issuance of road improvement bonds, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C. J.

The plaintiff Brooke, a resident and taxpayer of Spokane county, commenced this action seeking a decree enjoining the defendants, as officers of that county, from issuing and offering for sale certain road improvement bonds of the county, which they purpose and claim the right 'and authority to do in pursuance of the expressed will of the voters of the county at a special election. Trial upon the merits in the superior court resulted in a judgment denying to the plaintiff the relief prayed for; from which he has appealed to this court.

The particular proposed bond issue here in question is the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Spokane County v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API