Legal Opinion
State v. Haber
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 28, 1945PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
Tersely stated the dispositive question for decision on the facts of this case is whether the re-sentencing of the plaintiff in error infringes the fundamental requirements of due process of law — of fair play.
Our answer to the question is in the affirmative. A statement of the undisputed events and the dates upon which they occurred, as disclosed by the record submitted, consisting of a return to the writ of error and depositions taken on the ancillary writ of certiorari to review the re-sentencing of the plaintiff in error, hereafter…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- State v. RoweSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- State ex rel. Gehrmann v. OsborneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1911
- Johnson v. City of WildwoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. LaganellaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
- State v. BakerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- State v. ZachowskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- State v. MorettiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- State v. HeislerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.