Legal Opinion

Ball v. Siegel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Gardner, Judge, presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Gardner, Judge, presiding. This was a hill in equity, in the Superior Court of Cook county, by Thomas H. Ball, Herman Prenzlauer and Simon Florsheim, against Ferdinand Siegel, Henry Siegel, Emanuel Siegel and Gustav Schilling, to enjoin the use of appellants’ trade mark, adopted to designate corsets manufactured by them, and also to enjoin appellees from copying hand-bills, labels, advertisements, and circulars and bills. The bill alleges that…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield

The words, “health-preserving, ” preceding the word, “corset, ” beyond all question but describe a quality of the corset, —i. e., an effect which its use will produce,—and can not, therefore, be employed as a trade mark. Amoskeag Manf. Co. v. Spear, 2 Sandf. C. C. 599; Canal Co. v. Clark, 13 Wall. 311; Manufacturing Co. v. Francis, 101 U. S. (11 Otto,) 51; Gilman v. Hunnewel et al. 122 Mass. 122; Larrabee v. Lewis, 67 Ga. 561; Royal Baking Powder Co. v. Sherrell, 93 N. Y. 331. Many of the cases illustrating this principle will be found collected, in Freeman’s note to Partridge v. Menck, 47…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. . TroxellNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Partridge v. MenckNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  4. Popham v. . ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. King v. BronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zangerle & Peterson Co. v. Venice Furniture Novelty Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. DeLong Hook & Eye Co. v. Hump Hairpin Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Filter Dynamics International, Inc. v. Astron Battery, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  4. Mossler v. JacobsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  5. Stevens-Davis Co. v. Mather & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API