Legal Opinion

Gillis v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 10, 1940PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The purpose of the suit is to establish title to 200 acres of land. It is sufficient to say that the contest is between E. D. Hill’s heirs and vendees, appellants, and Gr. W. Wilder’s heirs and vendees, appellees. The record, of course, discloses the identity of the several parties.

For the plaintiffs it was .established that Gr. W. Wilder and his brother, Elijah, procured a patent to 150 acres in 1852 on a survey made in 1851, and Gr. W. Wilder alone acquired a patent to 200 acres adjoining in 1885 on a survey made in 1883. It was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StrunkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  2. Swift Coal Timber Company v. IsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Kentucky Union Company v. GilliamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Denney v. AbbottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  5. Carson v. TurkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Marsee v. ColsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Cline v. BlackburnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  3. Shepherd v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Hellier Coal & Coke Co. v. BowlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API