Legal Opinion

O'Shaughnessy v. Dodd

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1984PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, for the reason stated in the memorandum of that court.

A multiparty candidate has the same right to a drawing for ballot position as does a single party’s nominee (Matter of Wolf v Acito, 42 NY2d 1076). The only time the statutorily granted right to a drawing for ballot position under subdivision 2 of section 7-116 of the Election Law may be refused a candidate is when the exercise of that right might work a displacement on the ballot prejudicial to the candidates of other parties preferred…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooke v. LomenzoNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Mintz v. CuomoNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Wolf v. AcitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Strong v. Suffolk County Board of ElectionsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
  2. Brown v. DeGraceNew York Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API