Legal Opinion
Schonberg v. Federal Election Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 12, 2011No. Civil Action 10-02040PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
2Per curiam
Currently pending before the court designated to hear and determine plaintiff Steve Schonberg’s second amended complaint are four motions: (1) Schonberg’s motion to trifurcate the proceedings; (2) defendant Federal Election Commission’s motion to dissolve the three-judge district court; (3) the Commission’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint; and (4) defendant United States’ motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. This opinion addresses only the motion to dissolve the three-judge district court filed by the Commission. For the following reasons, we grant…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lake Carriers' Assn. v. MacMullanSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Rufer v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Independence Institute v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Republican Party of Louisiana v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Schonberg v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Schonberg v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011