Crum v. Missouri Director of Revenue
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAUGHREY, District Judge.
The parties have filed cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ Motion is Doc. # 36, the Missouri Director of Revenue’s (“DOR”) Motion is Doc. # 32, and the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts’s (“the Board”) Motion is Doc. # 33. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants the Motions of DOR and the Board and denies Plaintiffs’ Motion.
I. Background
A. The Missouri Statute
Missouri law authorizes the revocation of the license of any physician who fails to comply with certain Missouri tax laws. Mo.Rev.Stat. § 324.010 states:
All…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Snider International Corporation v. Town of Forest Heights, MDCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Carmen Austell v. Kimberly SprengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Griffin v. BiermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Missouri Real Estate Commission v. RayfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Opinion No. (2007), Missouri Attorney General Reports2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.