Robertson v. New Hampshire Insurance

The appeal in this case and in the ease against the Insurance Company of Pennsylvania involves substantially the same questions. The • principal ground of error alleged by the appellants is that the court should, have granted the defendants" motion for a nonsuit, and decided, as a matter - of law, that the conditions contained in the policy had not' been waived. There is some evidence from which the jury might find that the companies, by their duly-authorized agent, intended to and did waive the conditions of the-policy which authorized the company to call for an examination of the plaintiff,…