Legal Opinion

Canida v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 2, 1992No. 349-92PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*294OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

A jury convicted Appellant of delivery of marihuana in an amount less than five pounds and more than four ounces. After finding the enhancement allegation to be true, the jury assessed punishment at confinement for fifty years. The conviction was affirmed. Canida v. State, 823 S.W.2d 382 (Tex.App.—Texarkana 1992). We granted Appellant’s petition to address his contention that under this Court’s opinion in Cole v. State, 839 S.W.2d 798 (Tex, Cr.App.1990), which was pending on rehearing, the Court of Appeals erred in upholding the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cole v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  2. Canida v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
  2. Canida v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API