State ex rel. Haeussler v. Court of Appeals
Supreme Court of Missouri
Mandamus to the Judges of the St. Louis Court of Appeals. The title to real estate is involved. The question is analogous to that presented by a bill in equity to remove a cloud on title to real property. Clark v. Cov. Mut. Ins. Go., 52 Mo. 272; Sullivan v. Finnegan, 101 Mass. 447; Clouston v. Shearer, 99 Mass. 209; Pettit v. Sheperd, 5 Paige 493; Christie v. líale, 46 111. 117.
1Opinion of the Court
Houeií, J.
On the 23rd day of March, 1876, the relator filed a petition in the circuit court of St. Louis county, to enjoin a sale under execution of certain real estate in St. Louis, upon the ground that such sale would cast a cloud upon his title. A perpetual injunction was decreed by the circuit court, and on appeal to the Court of Appeals the judgment of the circuit court was reversed, and the'cause remanded. Thereupon the relator applied for an appeal to this court, and the Court of Appeals refused to allow the same. The relator now asks that a writ of mandamus be issued by this court…
2Cited by30 opinions
- Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauheySupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
- Loewenstein v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Price v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- State ex rel. South Missouri Pine Lumber Co. v. DearingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
- Balz v. NelsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.