Legal Opinion

State v. Maddox

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 4, 2021No. 19AP-72PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Maddox,

2021-Ohio-586.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 19AP-72 v. : (C.P.C. No. 16CR-6953) Dai'zhon L. Maddox, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on March 4, 2021 On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Daniel J. Stanley, for appellee. Argued: Daniel J. Stanley. On brief: Yeura R. Venters, Public Defender, and George M. Schumann, for appellant. Argued: George M. Schumann. APPEAL from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas SADLER, J. {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. OliverOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  2. State v. FarrowOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  3. State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State v. LaneOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. State v. EasterOhio Court of Appeals · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API