Legal Opinion · Dissent

Strickland v. Burns

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided July 1, 1966No. Civ. A. 4010Published

1Dissent

HARRY PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge (sitting as district judge by designation), (dissenting):

I do not agree that the “one man, one vote” rule applies to the Rutherford County School Commission, which is a local administrative agency created by the Legislature to administer the affairs of the county school system.

The Tennessee apportionment statute now provides for reapportionment of the Legislature upon the basis of population in accordance with Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 12 L.Ed.2d 506, and Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 82 S.Ct. 691, 7 L.Ed.2d 663. Under the latest decision in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Robert E. Lynch, Fred Hoffman and Phyllis Klein v. John R. Torquato, Edna Lugar and Virgil MoracaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API