Giampapa v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1ConcurrenceJustice Bender
specially concurring.
Because the majority approves the recovery of noneconomic damages for the willful and wanton breach of a contract, I write separately. The majority’s rule undermines the goals and purposes of contract law and conflates the important distinction between tort and contract law. I would disapprove of its future use and substitute a new rale for the recovery of noneconomic damages for a breach of contract claim. I would hold that noneconomic damages resulting from a breach of contract should be determined by a strict foreseeability test. Noneconomic damages should be available…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. PressmanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.