Krippner v. Biebl
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Nicollet county, Cox, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Case v. Hobart, 25 Wis. 654; Stewcvrt v. Hawley, 22 Barb. 619; Cooley on Torts, 69; Dewey v. Leonard, 14 Minn. 153; Wood v. Chicago, Mil. é St. Paul By. Co., 8 N. W. Rep. 214; Schelly. Second Nat. Bank, 14 Minn. 43; Greenland y. Chaplin, 5 Exch. 243; Bigby y. Hewitt, 5 Exch. 240; Hoey y. Felton, 11 C. B. (N. S.) 142; Cooky.
Read the full summary
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Nicollet county, Cox, J., presiding, refusing a new trial. cited Case v. Hobart, 25 Wis. 654; Stewcvrt v. Hawley, 22 Barb. 619; Cooley on Torts, 69; Dewey v. Leonard, 14 Minn. 153; Wood v. Chicago, Mil. é St. Paul By. Co., 8 N. W. Rep. 214; Schelly. Second Nat. Bank, 14 Minn. 43; Greenland y. Chaplin, 5 Exch. 243; Bigby y. Hewitt, 5 Exch. 240; Hoey y. Felton, 11 C. B. (N. S.) 142; Cooky. Champlain Transportation Co., 1 Denio, 92; Bellfountain B. Co. y. Snyder, 18 Ohio St. 399; Morrison y. Davis, 20 Pa. St. 171; Railroad Co. y.…
1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.
This cause, tried before the court below with a jury, comes to this court upon an appeal from an order refusing a new trial. The action is for negligence, the complaint alleging that the defendant intentionally and negligently kindled a fire upon certain lands, and so negligently and carelessly watched and tended the fire that it extended to the plaintiff’s land, there destroying certain personal property, the value of which is sought to be recovered. The answer admits the kindling of a fire by the defendant, but puts in issue the charge of negligence, and avers that the fire was extinguished…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fent v. Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Rld. v. StanfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Higgins v. DeweyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Griggs v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Case v. HobartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by20 opinions
- Anderson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Beckman v. SchroederSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Davidson v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Miller v. SabinskeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.