Legal Opinion

George Ringler & Co. v. Schmelzeisen

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 24, 1924PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The notice to quit was good despite the receipt, prior to the expiration of the lease, of rent for the month of March. It is only when after the expiration of the lease rent is received for a period after expiration that a waiver is presumed. Prindle v. Anderson, 19 Wend. 391. But there is res adjudícala here and it is the law of the case that the notice is bad. For the benefit of the parties upon a possible subsequent proceeding, it may be well to say that in our opinion the rent laws protect the tenant from removal, upon the grounds here, from that part of the premises leased as a dwelling,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prindle v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1838

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Housing Corp. v. LuxenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1957
  2. Sebco Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc. v. AcostaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API