Legal Opinion

Herr v. McLOUTH STEEL PRODUCTS CORP.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 2001No. Docket Nos. 118895-118900, COA Nos. 229262, 229306, 229310, 229312, 229314, and 229261Published

1Opinion of the Court

635 N.W.2d 310 (2001)

Daniel HERR, Claude Lavoie, Raymond Lawrence, Donald Moore, Loren Redd, Lester Pegouske, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

McLOUTH STEEL PRODUCTS CORP. and Michigan Mutual Insurance Company, Defendants Appellees.

Docket Nos. 118895-118900, COA Nos. 229262, 229306, 229310, 229312, 229314, and 229261.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 16, 2001.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal from the March 12, 2001 decision of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

2Concurrence · MarkmanMarkman, J.

I…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence · Cavanagh.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sterner v. McLouth Steel ProductsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API