Legal Opinion
Cabazon Band of Mission Indians v. County of Riverside
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 1986No. 84-6635PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
I. OVERVIEW
The State of California (State) and County of Riverside (County) appeal the district court’s granting of the Cabazon and Morongo Indians’ (Tribes) motion for summary judgment and its issuance of a permanent injunction restraining the State and County from applying their gambling laws on the reservation. The only issue on appeal is whether state and local gambling laws apply on Indian reservations. We affirm.
II. FACTS
The facts, as stipulated by the parties, are as follows:
The Tribes occupy separate reservations situated in Riverside County,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Juan Segundo v. City of Rancho Mirage, a Municipal Corporation, Jean Chormicle Kapp v. City of Cathedral City, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- United States of America State of Michigan, United States of America v. Frederick Dakota Sybil Dakota the Keweenaw Bay Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Indian Country v. State of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Chemehuevi Indian Tribe v. California State Board of EqualizationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.