Legal Opinion

City Lumber Co. v. Hollands

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1914No. Docket No. 27PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by the City Lumber Company against Harry F. Hollands and others to foreclose a land contract. From a decree for complainant both parties appeal. The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for the purpose of obtaining foreclosure of a land contract dated January 19, 1912, covering a lot located at the northeast corner of Lincoln and Warren avenues, in the city of Detroit.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Wayne; Mandell, J. Bill by the City Lumber Company against Harry F. Hollands and others to foreclose a land contract. From a decree for complainant both parties appeal. The bill of complaint in this cause is filed for the purpose of obtaining foreclosure of a land contract dated January 19, 1912, covering a lot located at the northeast corner of Lincoln and Warren avenues, in the city of Detroit. It appears that in 1902 defendant Hollands had acquired title to the lot in question. Thereafter he started to erect buildings thereon, but, through lack of capital, seems to have met…

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

(after stating the facts). The principal objection to the decree urged on behalf of defendant is that the amount fixed by the court to be paid by defendant upon redemption includes the sum of $1,000 agreed upon between the parties as a bonus and constituting a part of the consideration of $14,158 mentioned in the contract. At the time this contract was entered into complainant held a deed of the property from the circuit court commissioner dated August 2, 1910, a quitclaim deed from A. & E. Peters dated August 12, 1910, and a warranty deed from defendant dated September 1, 1910.

Defendant had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. BowlingMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Reed v. BondMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Stahl v. DehnMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barnard v. HuffMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Hoyt v. Union National Bank of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Cady v. TaggartMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Craig v. BlackMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Heppner v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API