Legal Opinion
Anthony Miller v. Rite Aid Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 30, 2003No. 02-2464PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
Anthony Miller, formerly an executive for the Rite Aid Corporation (“Rite Aid”), appeals the District Court’s decision, after a non-jury trial, that Miller lacked standing to bring a claim against Rite Aid pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Because Miller was never laid off, the District Court found that Miller: (1) is not, and never was, eligible to receive the severance benefits he sought through his civil suit; and (2) is no longer employed by Rite Aid and therefore has no prospect of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Graden v. Conexant Systems Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Baldwin v. University of Pittsburgh Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Cranpark, Inc. v. Rogers Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Felix v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Pell v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co. Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.