Legal Opinion

Patel v. Exxon Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 28, 2007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John F. O’Donnell, J.), entered March 21, 2006. The order granted plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and denied the cross motion of defendant Exxon Corporation, as successor in interest to Esso Standard Oil Company, Humble Oil and Refining Company, and The Humble Companies Charitable Trust, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of plaintiffs…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. LongNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Starnella v. HeatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. State v. PassalacquaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Patel v. Exxon Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tifft v. Bigelow's Oil Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. 1093 Group, LLC v. CanaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. One Flint St., LLC v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. ONE FLINT ST., LLC v. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATIONAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  5. One Flint St., LLC v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API